Featured image is my father's custom garnet ring, designed by Irene S. Sirois. Copyrighted design.
If I didn't have to work, I would probably read. All day, most of the night, nonstop page-turning. Like most bibliophiles I have some preferred genres and authors, but if you put something with words on it in front of me, I'm going to read it before you've finished telling me not to (so please don't). This means I have to practice extreme selectivity, because I simply don't have time to read it all. In practice that translates to rationing my reading time, where my time currency is portioned out like my 8th grade allowance,
with wild abandon sparingly and with great care.
So it might surprise you to know that I spend a daily allotment of what I lovingly call Industry Research Time poring over every blog, publication, article, Google Alert, LinkedIn Pulse, and Instagram post I can find. I take notes -- actual, physical ones and purely mental ones -- and attempt to connect the dots between what I'm reading and what I'm experiencing. I sift through opinions, corroborate facts, and weigh topics in an effort to determine what's important, who's talking about it, and how I think and feel about it all.
When you consume this much material, it's inevitable to come across some things you simply don't agree with. Most of the time this happens with op-eds and other opinion-based articles, and stems from having a very different perspective on the topic. Exactly such a case can be found in this article, published in the May 2016 MJSA Journal entitled "Is 'Custom' a Dirty Word?" which I encourage everyone to read.
The piece describes the challenges of defining what "custom jewelry" means -- I subject I've discussed before -- and goes on to describe how Lisa Krikawa of Krikawa Jewelry works around what she perceives as the extreme limitations of selling custom or customized jewelry. This workaround is to essentially remove the word custom from the conversation entirely, because she experiences the usual backlash of fear and distrust from clients who prefer to touch and try on their designs before purchasing.
To say that I sympathize with this position is an understatement, having sold both full custom and customized jewelry myself. And Krikawa's actual conversations with clients reflect the realities of selling this type of product, in such a way that they feel heard and understood. This is exactly the right approach, and I couldn't agree more with her process of offering examples from the showcase, hand sketches, and CAD models. It's what I used to do, too, and it works.
In part, the solution to the touch me/feel me issue can be answered by the amazing technology I work with in my current profession. Using 3D printers to prototype quickly and cheaply gives the client a physical piece to touch and try on, even with temporarily seated gems so the full effect is present. Now the relevant questions -- too tall? too thick? right size? in proportion? etc. -- can be answered in real time, without the expense of fixing these issues after the fact.
My main argument with Krikawa's approach is that by working so hard to eliminate a particular word from a client's vocabulary, the opportunity to educate them about custom is lost. The process of qualifying a client for potential custom work does not need to turn them off or scare them away from a purchase; when handled with careful explanation, my nervous clients turned into my best evangelists for the custom process (hello, referrals!).
I have worked very hard to promote the idea of custom jewelry as the future on the industry, and feel that removing it from the conversation is counterproductive. I prefer to help the client understand and appreciate the opportunity, educate them as to the options, and explain how the risks are mitigated or eliminated.
There are few things I appreciate more than the people who expend serious time and energy making their clients happy, regardless of how they accomplish that feat. I hope the various opinions and theories about custom jewelry continue to expand and develop, especially as technology grows and offers more solutions to an often cumbersome process.
Please comment with your thoughts, I'd love to keep the conversation going!